Airline accused of fat shaming

by Tusi Tala, Staff Writer

A Tinian inter-island airline has been accused of discrimination by the US Customs and Border Protection (USCBP) after it sought to have a โ€œweight specificโ€ officer assigned, in line with the aircraftโ€™s weight limitations.

Star Marianas, which has been offering complimentary transport for USCBP personnel from Saipan to Rota to meet pre-screening needs for flights to Guam, reached out to USCBP port director Ferdinand Mallari to request a โ€œlightweightโ€ officer, if possible.

This led Mallari to label the airlineโ€™s actions as discriminatory.

โ€œI have repeatedly informed you about this request for a โ€˜weight specificโ€™ officer,โ€ he stated.

โ€œThis is inherently discriminatory, and I do not condone or accept such requests. Please refrain from making similar requests in the future.

โ€œYou will receive whoever is assigned, as all our officers are equally qualified and trained for their roles.โ€

In response, Star Marianas board chair Robert Christian emphasized that the request was not meant to discriminate but was related to essential weight limitations for their aircraft.

โ€œOur request was strictly due to our aircraftโ€™s limited capacity and the critical weight restrictions necessary for safe operation,โ€ he noted.

โ€œTo suggest that we are discriminating against USCBP officers is unfounded and undermines the cooperative spirit of this program.โ€

Christian expressed disappointment in Mallariโ€™s comments and mentioned that Star Marianas would be reevaluating its voluntary participation in the arrangement with CBP.

โ€œWe were not only surprised by your message but also disappointed by its unprofessional tone and lack of constructive communication.

โ€œStar Marianas will continue to emphasize the need for officers with lower body weights while we reassess our voluntary involvement in this program.

โ€œLet me be clear: our participation in the program allowing USCBP pre-clearance on our flights is completely voluntary.

โ€œWe are not obligated to continue this arrangement, and, to my knowledge, USCBP can also choose to end its participation.

โ€œYour description of our request regarding the assigned officerโ€™s weight as โ€˜discriminatoryโ€™ is both incorrect and offensive.โ€